Neural-Responsive Biohybrid Prosthetic Concepts
Toolbox (core tools used / referenced): Python; C++; GitHub; VS Code; ROS (or equivalent middleware) and physics/simulation engines (e.g. Gazebo or PyBullet) for virtual prototyping; anatomical / biomechanics modeling tools (Blender, MakeHuman / MB-Lab, URDF) for prosthetic geometry and interface design; numerical & data-analysis libraries (NumPy / SciPy; plotting/visualization libraries); custom neural-interface and biosignal processing modules (EMG/ENG decoding, neural-signal acquisition & processing); documentation and write-up tools (design notes, reports, future publications).
Overview / Abstract
This project explores the concept and design of biohybrid, neural-responsive prosthetic modules that integrate biologically inspired sensing/actuation, soft-material compliance, and neural/biomechanical signal interfacing to improve comfort, control fidelity, and long-term wearability. The goal is to move beyond rigid, traditional prosthetic limbs toward devices capable of interacting naturally with the user’s nervous and musculoskeletal system — leveraging soft materials, bio-inspired actuation/sensing, and neural interface technology. Ultimately, the aim is to conceptualize next-generation prosthetics that offer improved embodiment, better signal quality (EMG/ENG), enhanced comfort, and a path toward prosthetics that feel more “alive” and integrated.
Research Goals / Specific Aims
Design biohybrid prosthetic modules combining soft-material sensing/actuation with neural-signal interfacing — developing architecture, selecting materials, and specifying sensing/actuation strategies and neural-interface pipelines.
Develop robust neural-signal acquisition and decoding pipelines (e.g. EMG/ENG or peripheral neural signals) to translate user neural or muscular intent into control commands with high fidelity, low latency, and stable performance.
Model and simulate biomechanical behavior and user–prosthetic interaction using virtual prototyping: evaluate performance, compliance, comfort, signal stability, and response under variable loads and realistic tasks.
Assess feasibility, performance, and wearability of soft / biohybrid prosthetics in simulated or bench-test environments — characterizing control fidelity, responsiveness, comfort, durability, and possible failure modes.
Formulate design guidelines and specifications for next-generation prosthetics (materials, sensing/actuation, neural interface, modular architecture) that balance practicality, user comfort, signal quality, and long-term viability.
Significance / Why It Matters
Rigid traditional prosthetics often suffer from issues related to comfort, limited feedback, bulky structure, poor sensing/actuation, and suboptimal signal quality. Biohybrid, soft-material, neural-responsive design has potential to overcome many of these limitations — improving user satisfaction, embodiment, and function.
By integrating neural interfacing and soft-material sensing/actuation, this approach could bring prosthetics closer to biological limbs in behavior and integration, narrowing the gap between artificial limb function and natural limb function.
Such prosthetics could enable more intuitive control, better sensory feedback, and adaptive behavior — beneficial not only for amputees but also for future human-augmentation or rehabilitation technologies.
The project aligns with emerging advances in bio-inspired electronics, neurointerfaces, soft robotics, and biohybrid systems — contributing to a growing field that merges soft robotics, bioelectronics, neural interfacing, and biomechanics.
Methods / Approach
Begin with conceptual design and feasibility analysis: define materials, actuation mechanisms, sensor placement, neural / biosignal acquisition, signal conditioning, control algorithms, and feedback loops.
Use virtual prototyping: combine musculoskeletal/biomechanical simulation (dynamics) with soft-material or finite-element modeling (compliance, deformation, comfort) to simulate user-prosthetic interactions under load, movement, and contact.
Implement modular signal processing pipelines: capture neural or muscular signals (EMG/ENG), preprocess (filter, denoise), decode into control commands (e.g. via machine learning or classical control), feed commands to actuation system, sense feedback via soft sensors — establish closed feedback loops to mimic physiological sensing–actuation cycles.
Test control fidelity, responsiveness, latency, and signal stability under varied simulated tasks (movement, grasping, contact, load) — measure performance, comfort proxies, predicted stress/strain, and signal noise.
Document all design decisions, material parameters, signal-processing code, control algorithms, feedback strategies, and simulation results to ensure reproducibility and clarity.
Iterate design: refine materials, actuation, sensing, signal processing pipelines based on simulation outcomes; identify trade-offs (performance vs comfort, signal fidelity vs compliance) and optimize for usability.
If feasible: plan bench-test or hardware-in-the-loop prototypes — starting with sub-modules (sensor patches or compliant actuators) before scaling to full prosthetic prototypes.
Expected Deliverables & Outcomes
Design documents and specifications for biohybrid prosthetic modules (materials, actuation, sensing, neural interface, control pipeline).
Virtual prototypes (simulation + soft-material / biomechanical + neural-interface modeling) demonstrating feasibility, basic performance, compliance / comfort trade-offs.
Signal-processing / decoding pipeline code (for EMG/ENG or neural interface) with documentation.
Evaluation reports on control performance, responsiveness, signal fidelity, simulated comfort / compliance, and failure mode analysis.
Guidelines or a white-paper describing design recommendations for biohybrid, neural-responsive prosthetics — useful for future hardware iterations or collaborations.
A modular architecture framework that could support future hardware development, user testing, or open-source / collaborative efforts.
Current Status & Next Steps
Currently in initial conceptual design and feasibility-analysis phase — defining candidate materials, actuation/sensing/ neural-interface pipeline requirements.
Near-term: begin virtual prototyping — soft-material modeling, biomechanics + neural-interface simulations, integrate components into modular simulation / virtual-prototype framework.
Develop and test neural / biosignal processing pipelines (EMG/ENG decoding / signal conditioning) using synthetic or simulated signals — assess decoding accuracy, latency, noise resilience.
Conduct simulation-based performance evaluation: control fidelity, responsiveness, compliance, durability predictions, comfort metrics.
Iterate design based on simulation outcomes; produce refined design specifications; document findings; plan for possible hardware-in-the-loop or bench testing in next development phase.
References / Links / Additional Resources
López-González, A., Tejada, J. C., & López-Romero, J. (2023). Review and proposal for a classification system of soft robots inspired by animal morphology. Biomimetics, 8(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8020192
Wang, X., et al. (2025). Bioinspired intelligent soft robotics: From multidisciplinary advances to applications. Soft Robotics. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12407382/
Chen, Z., et al. (2025). Bio-inspired and biohybrid soft robots: Principles and recent developments. Matter. https://www.cell.com/matter/fulltext/S2590-2385(25)00088-8
Clink the link to access the detailed page of all “Resources & Tooling”